Flight Simulator Cockpit Hardware – Aircraft Simpits:
Simpits, sometimes known as simulation cockpits, are settings created to mimic a vehicle cockpit. The word applies equally to projects for trains, spacecraft, and automobiles even though many pits are frequently constructed around an airplane cockpit.
Simpit, which is the subject of this article, is a broad term for amateur, home-built systems. Please see Flight Simulator for more details about commercial flight simulators.
The controls, instruments, and communications in airplane cockpits are frequently more complicated than those in other simulations by design. Anyone building a cockpit faces unique additional hurdles in recreating these. Particularly in the wake of the 9/11 attacks or if the builder has selected a modern military aircraft, access to actual aircraft cockpits is likely to be restricted due to security concerns. Aircraft components are frequently expensive to buy.
By replicating a class of aircraft rather than an individual aircraft, many of the issues can be avoided. This will result in the creation of a generic GA, airliner, or military cockpit that, while lacking some genuine aircraft’s buttons and switches, will nevertheless contain all the essential components for simulation.
By replicating a class of aircraft rather than an individual aircraft, many of the issues can be avoided. This will result in the creation of a generic GA, airliner, or military cockpit that, while lacking some genuine aircraft’s buttons and switches, will nevertheless contain all the essential components for simulation. Building a precise 1:1 copy of the original cockpit using authentic panels or perhaps the entire cockpit from the chosen jet is the opposite extreme of the scale. All cockpit constructions will fall somewhere in the between of these two ideas, and even extremely precise replica cockpits will frequently make some compromises, if only because of the simulation software that powers them.
The choice of aircraft will be crucial for replica pits. Due to the popularity of home cockpits, several businesses now provide entire kits for common aircraft, and it is not too difficult to find information on the panels of current Airbus and Boeing aircraft. Museums or scrap yards are excellent places to find information about older airplanes. Even while research frequently turns up a ton of data, there are occasions when only a small nuance is required. For instance, the width of the central pedestal, the recommended size for it, or its location within the pit. More nuanced methods have been devised to access information when it is not in the public domain. Counting the pixels in a digital image of the
A scale can be determined by counting the pixels in an object with a known size, like a typical cockpit instrument. This can then be applied to determine the panel’s unknown elements’ sizes. Accuracy will vary based on the photograph’s resolution, the angle at which it was taken, and other factors. However, in circumstances where there may be no other source of information, this can provide a fair guideline for dimensions.
Within the “pit,” the degree of functionality will also change. Very realistic-looking pits could feature inoperative instruments that are merely there to complete the cockpit’s “feel.” Individual real instruments, either recreated or modified from real airplane parts, would be the pinnacle of realism. This method offers the greatest immersion but dramatically increases the complexity of the project since interface devices must be made and the corresponding software drivers must be built. The instruments can be shown on a monitor that is mounted behind the panel as a compromise between the two. When the cuts are used, the simulated instruments may then be seen, creating a more realistic effect, especially if the airplane actually employs glass cockpit displays.
Commercial aircraft pits are frequently constructed merely for entertainment, while general aviation pits are frequently constructed for actual pilots to learn on. Few non-professional pilots ever get the chance to fly an actual airliner, but a lifelike home simulator will offer a completely immersive experience.
Builders face a larger problem when creating commercial airliner pits since there are more systems to simulate, like the autopilot, CDU/FMS, engine management, etc. Even the throttle quadrant is more intricately engineered than the GA Cessna’s push/pull throttle, which is only a duplicate of it. The community can, however, purchase replica panels, controls, and even entire cockpits from a number of commercial sources. Builders frequently create components at home using wood or other easily worked materials when these or “genuine” components are not accessible or are out of their price range.
It has becoming simpler to make extremely realistic panels because the majority of modern airplanes have “glass cockpit” displays. These panels’ displays can be operated by multi-head graphics cards or networked PCs running specialized software that can share the computing burden by reading from the simulator. Interfaces for switches, knobs, and other necessary components can be made using existing hardware, like keyboards or joysticks, or they can be bought commercially. A commercial extension board is typically used to complete feedback from the PC to the panel, which is more complicated and often used to move real instruments or light warning lamps.
The military pit is the third popular genre for a simpit. These simulators are often more geared toward entertainment than instruction, similar to commercial pits. Due to the availability of extremely accurate simulation software (Falcon 4.0) of this aircraft, military-based pits are frequently based on a single aircraft, frequently the F-16.
A proper flight simulator is one of the initial pieces of software needed for a simpit in order to provide the graphics, sound, and instrument outputs for the pit. As of 2013, the Digital Combat Simulator series has sparked interest for the A-10 as well. Currently, the majority of civilian simulators are built around Microsoft Flight Simulator, and the bulk of military simulators use Falcon 4.0 as a platform. Another great software program with strong support for multiple screens is X-Plane 11.
A simpit frequently includes voice communication (VoIP) software because it enables real-time communication with other virtual pilots.
Other software, such as an MFD interpreter or a bespoke listener to create an AoA Indexer, may be specially written to control hardware features of the pit. Using control hardware with a thorough SDK or API can often eliminate the need for custom software, but for special instruments, an off-the-shelf solution is usually unavailable, necessitating the use of proprietary software.
That’s it. Hope you liked reading this article and found it useful. I’ve tried to explain everything in a simple way and I’ll cover more topics like this in the future. Feel free to share all your thoughts in comments below, I would be happy to read and reply to them.
Thank you and see you soon in the next article.